A leading barrister has cast doubt on the credibility of Angela Rayner’s account of her controversial property transactions, suggesting that her version of events would not be believed by any jury.
Unconvincing Narrative
According to the prominent legal expert, Angela Rayner’s explanation of her property dealings lacks credibility and would likely face skepticism from members of a jury, raising questions about the legitimacy of the transactions.
Potential Jury Rejection
The barrister’s assessment indicates that Angela Rayner’s account of her property transactions may not withstand scrutiny in a courtroom setting, as it fails to provide convincing evidence or explanation to support her actions.
Challenges to Legitimacy
The expert analysis highlights potential challenges to the legitimacy of Angela Rayner’s property dealings, suggesting that key aspects of her narrative may be deemed implausible or unsubstantiated by a jury.
Implications for Rayner
The barrister’s assertion poses significant implications for Angela Rayner, as it suggests that her property dealings could come under further scrutiny and raise doubts about her credibility and trustworthiness in the public eye.
World News
TDPel Media
This article was published on TDPel Media. Thanks for reading!Share on Facebook «||» Share on Twitter «||» Share on Reddit «||» Share on LinkedIn