In a striking case unfolding in London’s High Court, a judge found herself navigating what she described as an “alternative reality” while handling a dispute between ex-partners over access to their alleged three-year-old twins.
The mother claims these children do not exist, adding a layer of complexity to the already perplexing case.
Lady Emma Arbuthnot, who presided over the case, reported that there is “some evidence” suggesting at least one child was born. The situation involves a separated couple, with the ex-husband insisting that his former wife was pregnant when they parted ways.
He believes she gave birth to twin boys who would now be three years old, and he wishes to establish contact with them.
The ex-wife, however, denies ever being pregnant and accuses her former partner of “coercive and controlling behavior.” No official records of any births have been found, which adds to the confusion.
Despite this, the High Court received evidence suggesting that at least one child might exist. According to the ex-husband, this child was born after their marriage in 2019 and their separation in 2020.
The Judge’s Observations
In her ruling, Lady Arbuthnot mentioned that she believes a birth occurred in a private hospital but could not determine the child’s current whereabouts.
She was particularly struck by the challenges of uncovering the facts without the benefit of legal representation from both parties. The judge noted that the Family Court is not equipped to act as an investigator, and a different outcome might have emerged with more evidence.
Expert Insight
Family law expert Lucy Reed highlighted the difficulty of such cases for the courts. She pointed out that “it would be difficult for an outsider to believe a tale involving the many twists and turns” that this case has presented.
TDPel Media
This article was published on TDPel Media. Thanks for reading!
Share on Facebook «||» Share on Twitter «||» Share on Reddit «||» Share on LinkedIn