The legal saga surrounding Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie’s shared ownership of Chateau Miraval is heating up once again.
The high-profile case returns to court today with new developments that could impact the ongoing conflict between the former couple.
Brad Pitt, 60, and Angelina Jolie, 49, have been entangled in a bitter dispute over the French vineyard they bought together in 2008.
The trouble began when Jolie sold her half of the property in October 2021 for $62 million, a move Pitt claims violated their agreement to give each other the right of first refusal.
Since then, their legal battle has intensified, particularly over issues related to non-disclosure agreements (NDAs).
Jolie was recently ordered to provide all NDAs she signed from 2014 to 2022, after alleging that Pitt pressured her into signing one to prevent her from discussing past abuse allegations.
Today’s court session, held at an LA courthouse, is a crucial moment in their ongoing legal fight. While neither Pitt nor Jolie is expected to attend, the case continues to attract attention.
This comes shortly after Jolie’s former company, Nouvel LLC, which is now part of Yuri Shefler’s Tenute del Mondo B.V., filed a motion to compel Campari America LLC to reveal details about a distribution agreement with Chateau Miraval.
The motion, filed on July 29, seeks information about a contract executed in September 2023 and questions how Campari secured exclusive distribution rights amid the legal dispute.
Financial and Legal Fallout
Pitt’s argument against the sale of Jolie’s stake to Shefler includes claims that the transaction, completed on October 5, 2021, negatively impacts the brand’s value due to geopolitical tensions following the Russian invasion of Ukraine.
In response, Jolie’s former company has launched a $250 million lawsuit against Pitt, accusing him of seeking revenge through attempts to control the company.
When Pitt and Jolie originally acquired the estate, Pitt took a 60% share while Jolie had 40%. Pitt invested significantly, boosting the winery’s sales by 300% and increasing its value from an estimated $60 million to about $164 million. Jolie had reportedly ceased her financial contributions before their marriage, although she denies this.
To balance their shares, Pitt transferred 10% of his stake to Jolie as a wedding gift, making them equal partners by their marriage in August 2014.
NDA Dispute and Family Matters
The conflict over NDAs has been a central issue. Jolie contends that Pitt’s request for her to sign an NDA was an unfair attempt to control her and silence her regarding past incidents.
Pitt’s legal team argues that the NDAs were standard procedure to protect sensitive financial information and the brand’s reputation.
A ruling in May required Jolie to produce all relevant NDAs, which she and her team view as crucial for disproving Pitt’s allegations.
In July, Jolie’s lawyer, Paul Murphy, stated that unless Pitt withdraws his lawsuit, Jolie must gather evidence to counter his claims.
Recent documents filed by Pitt’s team argue that Jolie’s requests for evidence, including details about his therapy, alcohol consumption, and communications with government agencies, are intended to embarrass him rather than uncover relevant information.
Ongoing Divorce and Custody Issues
The couple’s protracted divorce, which began in 2016, remains unresolved. Their legal disputes have included ongoing battles over custody of their six children and other personal matters.
Jolie and Pitt’s split has been a tumultuous journey, and today’s court session is just another chapter in their complex and high-stakes legal drama.
TDPel Media
This article was published on TDPel Media. Thanks for reading!Share on Facebook «||» Share on Twitter «||» Share on Reddit «||» Share on LinkedIn